What's the lesson from Brian Casel's experience about the future of SDKs, no-code workflows, and automation?
In short: SDKs are dead - well, at least for many use cases in modern application development.
What's the lesson from Brian Casel's experience about the future of SDKs, no-code workflows, and automation?
In short: SDKs are dead - well, at least for many use cases in modern application development.
Transcripts from podcasts are treasure troves of insights, ideas, and stories. However, accessing and utilizing this wealth of information can be challenging for marketers, product managers, and content creators—especially those without deep technical expertise.
Lenny Rachitsky posted on LinkedIn about sharing transcripts of his podcast episodes, I decided to format the transcripts for easy consumption by language models and AI tools.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of the Model Context Protocol (MCP), architects are facing a critical decision: how to secure and govern connections between AI clients and a sprawling ecosystem of tools and data servers.
The traditional answer is a Gateway—a centralized proxy that inspects every byte. The modern answer is a Connect Authority—a distributed Zero Trust model that separates permission from traffic.
The MCP Registry is designed as a centralized catalog and metadata service for MCP (Model Context Protocol) components. It provides discovery, verification, and governance capabilities for MCP clients and servers. The HAPI MCP Registry does not proxy traffic; instead, it acts as a mcp connection authority, issuing short-lived mcp connect descriptor tokens that authorize clients to connect directly to MCP Servers.
In the world of MCP (Model Context Protocol), two architectural patterns often come up for discussion: using a Registry as a Connect Authority versus deploying a traditional Gateway. While both approaches aim to manage and secure connections between clients and servers, they do so in fundamentally different ways.
In this article, we will explore why the MCP Registry + Connect Authority model often outperforms the traditional Gateway approach.
AI is everywhere. Too everywhere. From answering "hi" to deciding how your production platform runs sanity checks, we've quietly crossed a line. Not because AI can't do these things, but because it shouldn't do all of them.
You want your API to be instantly usable inside AI assistants like ChatGPT, and Web UIs. The OpenAI UI SDK plus the Model Context Protocol (MCP) lets you expose your API as structured tools that large language models can call directly.
For years, OpenAPI (OAS) has been the cornerstone of how we describe, document, and integrate APIs. It standardized how systems talk to each other — and in many ways, it made the modern internet possible.
So when the Model Context Protocol (MCP) appeared, some developers were skeptical. "Another spec?" they asked. "Why do we need this when we already have OAS?"
This guide demonstrates how to use the OpenAI Response API to integrate with the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for seamless, AI-driven API interactions. You will learn how to generate a REST API specification with Postman's AI Agent, deploy it as an MCP server using HAPI Server, and connect it through OpenAI's Response API for testing.
An evolution of tool calling with MCP, thanks to OpenAI's latest SDK updates.
Step-by-step, I'll guide you through setting up an MCP server, integrating it with the OpenAI SDK, and running a complete example that showcases dynamic tool calling. By the end of this post, you'll be equipped to leverage MCP in your own OpenAI-powered applications.